Understanding Terrain-Based Mission Analysis and Terrain Fidelity with Ansys STK
When engineers think about mission analysis, attention naturally goes to the vehicle, trajectory, sensor, communications system, or target.
Read Article →Learn how to evaluate centrifugal stresses in rotating components using static structural analysis in Ansys Mechanical — with theoretical validation, rotational inertia loads, and modal analysis for resonance risk assessment.

Centrifuge machines are widely used in industrial and laboratory applications to separate materials based on their density. During operation, these machines rotate at extremely high speeds, generating significant centrifugal forces. These forces act radially outward from the axis of rotation and induce stresses throughout the rotating components. Evaluating these stresses is critical for ensuring the structural integrity, safety, and performance of the system.
Analyse such stresses without explicitly simulating rotation, rotational velocity can be applied within a Static Structural analysis framework. In this approach, the part itself does not physically rotate; instead, rotational effects are represented as inertial body loads within the rotating reference frame formulation. This allows the centrifugal effects to be captured as inertial loads.
The general governing equation of motion is:
m·ẍ + c·ẋ + k·x = F(x) …(a)
For static structural analysis, the acceleration (ẍ) and velocity (ẋ) terms are neglected, simplifying the equation to:
k·x = F(x)
In this formulation, gravity, rotational velocity, and rotational acceleration are treated as inertial loads and included in the force term F(x).
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate stress in a component rotating at a constant angular velocity. Since the rotation is steady (no change in speed), transient effects such as acceleration and damping are not significant. Including them would unnecessarily complicate the analysis, requiring additional unknowns to be solved.
Static analysis offers a simplified yet effective solution in such cases. It avoids the computational complexity of transient analysis while still accurately capturing the stress distribution due to steady rotational effects. This approach is particularly useful in engineering practice, where quick and reliable stress estimates are often needed during design and validation stages.
The centrifugal force on a particle when it is moving with a velocity on a curve is given by:
F = ρ · ω² · r …Equ. (1)
Where:
Note: An important observation is that the centrifugal body force density increases linearly with radial distance from the axis of rotation. Therefore, elements located farther from the centre experience higher forces.
A solid homogeneous circular disk of uniform thickness (or a solid cylinder) of radius R mm, Poisson's ratio μ, and weight per unit volume ρ ton/mm³ rotates about its own axis with a uniform angular velocity of ω rad/s. At any point at distance r mm from the centre there is a radial tensile inertial stress (Roark's formula, 7th Ed., page 746).
σᵣ = ρ · ω² · (R² − r²) / 8 · (3 + μ) …Equ. (2)
Where:
| Location (Radial) | Centrifugal force (N) | Stress (MPa) |
|---|---|---|
| Center | Minimum | Maximum |
| Outer edge | Maximum | Zero |
This behaviour can be interpreted physically: although the outer edge experiences the highest centrifugal force, it is free to deform outward and therefore carries no radial stress. In contrast, the centre must resist the cumulative outward pull of all material surrounding it, resulting in maximum stress at the centre.
Verification at outer edge. Substituting r = 203 mm (outer-most) and R = 203 mm in Equ. (2):
σᵣ = 7.95e−9 · 209.44² · (203² − 203²) / 8 · (3 + 0.25) = 0 MPa
This confirms that radial stress is zero at the outer boundary.
Stress at inner region. At r = 12.5 mm, R = 203 mm, μ = 0.25, ρ = 7.95e−9 ton/mm³, ω = 209.44 rad/s, substituting these values in Equ. (2):
σᵣ = 7.95e−9 · 209.44² · (203² − 12.5²) / 8 · (3 + 0.25) = 5.82 MPa
This value shows that stresses increase as we move toward the centre.
To simulate the system in Ansys Mechanical:
Points to remember:
| Results | Hand calculation | Ansys FEA |
|---|---|---|
| Max stress (center) | 5.82 MPa | 6.0 MPa |
| Outer edge radial stress | 0 MPa | ~0 MPa |
Points to remember:
Setup: pre-stressed modal linked from static structural.
f₁ = ω / 2π = 209.44 / 2π = 33.33 Hz
| Modes | Frequency | Risk zone (±10%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1X | 33.33 Hz | 29.99–36.66 Hz |
| 2X | 66.66 Hz | 59.99–73.33 Hz |
| 3X | 99.99 Hz | 89.99–109.99 Hz |
Natural frequencies within ±10% of operating harmonics should be investigated further for potential resonance risk.
Static structural analysis is an efficient and practical method for evaluating stresses in rotating components operating at constant angular velocity. By neglecting transient effects such as acceleration and damping, the governing equations are simplified, making the analysis more computationally efficient while still providing accurate stress predictions.
In this method, the component does not physically rotate; instead, the coordinate system rotates, allowing centrifugal effects to be modelled as inertial loads. When combined with modal analysis, this approach also enables identification of critical frequencies and potential resonance risks. Overall, static analysis serves as a powerful tool for preliminary design and validation of rotating systems, ensuring structural integrity without the need for complex transient simulations.
References: Roark's formulas for stress and strain, 7th Ed. Page 746 / Ansys mechanical user's guide-inertial loads / Engineers edge-rotating disk stress calculator
Connect with CADFEM experts for advanced simulation, automation, and engineering solutions tailored to your industry.